Criminal Defense
Santa Ana DUI and Criminal Defense Attorney
Santa Ana, California is the most populous city in Orange County, with an estimated 2007 population of 339. If current estimates hold true, Santa Ana's population will have grown to 355,662 by 2009. Santa Ana, according to the 2000 United States Census, is one of the most densely populated cities in the United States (of cities that have more than 300,000 people), with 12,471.5 people per square mile, ranking behind…
Read More
Facebook and Myspace Disclosure of Evidence that Holds a Defendant’s Innocence
As the law offices of Wallin & Klarich work alongside attorney Robert C. Kasenow, II in defending the rights of our client accused of alleged sexual offenses, we have filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court seeking evaluation of a lower court order. Exculpatory evidence through subpoena or any other court process has previously been denied via the federal Stored Electronic Communications Act. Through our investigation and…
Read More
Marijuana Possession Conviction Occurring Before Current Offense Does Not Negate Eligibility for Deferred Entry of Judgment
Why Hiring an Experienced Criminal Defense Firm Can Assure You Are Given Access to All Available Court Programs Defendant, Oscar Armando Ochoa pled guilty to possessing cocaine after the trial court denied his motion to defer entry of judgment under penal code §1000. On appeal in California, Mr. Ochoa argued that the court erred in finding that his January 2006 conviction for possession of marijuana occurring more than two years…
Read More
Clearing Arrest Record After a False Arrest
Lessons From a Criminal Defense Lawyer It is possible for an officer to unintentionally or unlawfully arrest a person? If an officer arrests a person without sufficient probable cause, this is often referred to as a "false arrest." The consequences of an improper arrest can include suppression of any testimonial statements by the suspect, suppression of physical evidence, and personal liability for the officer. In addition, a factual innocence motion…
Read More
Know Your Rights: Students Are Protected from Strip Searches by School Officials
The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided a strip search was illegal where a minor student was suspected of carrying Ibuprofen on campus. During an incident in 2003 at Safford Middle School, a student told school officials that Savana Redding was carrying the painkillers. Two female staffers proceeded to conduct the strip search of Redding, but found no pills. The Supreme Court affirmed the 9th U.S. Circuit of Appeals ruling in…
Read More
The Fourth Amendment and Consent to Search a Vehicle
Whether Consent Given by Driver to Search Vehicle Was Given Voluntarily Requires Analysis by an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Who Understands the Fourth Amendment Voluntariness of consent to search must be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment and Article 1, section 5 of The United States Constitution "by examining the totality of the circumstances." Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. at 39; State v. Sherburne, 571 A.2d 1181, 1185 (Me. 1990). Consent…
Read More
An Arrest Occurs When an Officer Deprives a Person of Liberty in a Significant Way
Lessons From a Criminal Defense Attorney The traditional definition of arrest by an officer includes the following elements: (1) intent to arrest communicated by words or actions of the officer; (2) show of the officer's authority; (3) submission to custody or sufficient force to achieve custody by the officer; and (4) the person's understanding that he or she is under arrest. California statutorily defines an arrest as "taking a person…
Read More
9th District Federal Court of Appeals Reverses Murder Conviction After all State Courts Reject Appeal
Why You Need a Highly Skilled Criminal Appeals Law Firm to Help You In a case decided on July 7, 2009, the 9th District Federal Court of Appeals reversed the murder conviction of Mohammend Ali due to the courts finding that the prosecutor had committed prejudicial error when he excused the only two black prospective jurors from the jury pool. At the trial, the defendant's attorney had objected to the…
Read More
Court of Appeals Holds that Defendant is not Entitled to County Paid Experts at Sentencing Hearing
In People vs. Stuckey, decided by the 3rd District Court of Appeals on July 9, 2009 the court held that a defendant who is facing sentencing does not have the right to court appointed experts. The court held that the right to court appointed experts exists only up to the time of jury trial. Once a defendant has been found guilty, then the court held there has no further right…
Read More
Judge Dismisses Racketeering Convictions
Wallin & Klarich Criminal Defense Attorneys Compliment the Successful Use of a Government Misconduct Motion A recent article in the Los Angeles Times describes the story of George Torres, a 52 year old supermarket mogul, who was recently convicted in a massive racketeering case and was awaiting sentencing in federal prison. That sentence had the potential to be a life sentence, but thanks to the discovery of new evidence, and…
Read More