November 2, 2009 By Wallin & Klarich

For the “exclusionary rule” to apply, the search and seizure must have been conducted by a peace officer or other “state agent.” Evidence discovered by a non peace officer or private citizen does not fall within the protections of the exclusionary rule, and need not necessarily be suppressed.

A fact intensive analysis of the surrounding circumstances is important when determining whether the “private citizen” was acting at the order or discretion of a peace officer. In certain circumstances, a private citizen may be seen as an agent of the police, satisfying the “state action” requirement.

If you or someone you love has been accused of a crime in California, contact the experienced Southern California criminal defense attorneys at Wallin & Klarich today at 1-888-280-6839 or for a consultation of your case. We can help you.

Read more on this topic in our blog tomorrow.

Contact Us
  •   17592 Irvine Blvd,
      Tustin, CA 92780
  •   (714) 730-5300
  •   (888) 280-6839
SCHEDULE YOUR free consultation

If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, this is the time to contact us.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright © 2024 Wallin & Klarich - All rights reserved

California Criminal Defense Lawyer Disclaimer: The legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor should it be considered the formation of a lawyer or attorney-client relationship. Any case results presented on the site are based upon the facts of a particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. The contents of this website may contain legal advertising. If you would like to find out more information about your particular legal matter, contact our office for a free telephonic consultation. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the state of California.