Supreme Court Rules Age Is Significant When Law Enforcement Questions Suspects

June 21, 2011,

The case before the Untied States Supreme Court dealt with whether a 13-year-old boy should have been notified of his “Miranda” rights. Including telling him he need not answer questions before being questioned by police officers. The boy was suspected of committing several burglaries. After first denying any involvement, the minor admitted breaking into several homes and stealing items.

The Untied States Supreme Court’s decision in the Miranda case established that suspects in custody must be advised of various rights, including the right to remain silent before police officers can begin questioning. If Miranda warnings are not given, any statements that the suspect makes to law enforcement may be excluded from evidence.

In California, burglary is codified under Penal Code Section 459. It states in pertinent part that “every person who enters any house… with intent to commit… any felony is guilty of burglary.” Residential burglary is a felony in Califronia, and may result in a strike, if convicted. The punishment for residential burglary in California is up to six years in prison.

If you or a loved one has been arrested, it is imperative you contact our firm. Hiring an experienced criminal defense law firm is the best way to ensure you keep your freedom. The attorneys at Wallin & Klarich have been helping people for over 30 years.

Please feel free to contact Wallin & Klarich to discuss your case. You can reach us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 877-466-5245 or go to our website at www.wklaw.com for more information.

Roadside Detention, Interrogation and Miranda

April 14, 2011,

Once a vehicle stop has been made and a DUI investigation has commenced, the issue arises as to when a DUI suspect is “in custody” for purposes of the landmark case Miranda v. Arizona. The Miranda Court repeatedly made clear that “by custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”

For purposes of Miranda, it would seem clear that a motorist has been deprived of his or her freedom of action in a significant way, and thus is in custody, when a police officer conducts an investigation. DUI investigations include (a) pulling the motorist over, (b) seizing the motorist’s driver’s license and registration, (c) questioning the motorist, (d) ordering the motorist to exit the vehicle, and (e) demanding that the motorist remain outside the vehicle and perform field sobriety tests, and so on. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has held that in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, such a detention does not constitute custodial interrogation, and thus is not protected by the Fifth Amendment and Miranda.

In order to make sure that your rights are accurately and aggressively defended after being charged with DUI in Southern California, you should contact the experienced Southern California criminal defense law firm of Wallin & Klarich. Our attorneys have been helping those accused of crimes for more than 30 years. Wallin & Klarich has the legal resources and knowledge to assist you in obtaining a successful outcome. Call Wallin & Klarich today at 888-280-6839 or visit www.wklaw.com to find out more about how we can help.

Why do Cops Violate Your Constitutional Rights when they encounter you?

March 8, 2011,

The simple answer is because there are some cops that will violate your rights because they refuse to follow the law. However, other police officers will violate your rights because they know that the conservative majority on the United States Supreme Court will likely support their conduct. Let me give you just one quick example of how recent court decisions have given the police more power to violate your rights when you are stopped or arrested.

Many years ago the US Supreme Court decided People vs. Miranda and in that decision the court made it clear that before law enforcement could question you they had to read you your "right to remain silent and right to a lawyer". You had the right to tell the officers you didn't want to speak to them. However, over the past two decades the Miranda decision has lost most of its legal impact due to the more conservative current Supreme Court wiping away many of the protections of Miranda.

The more recent Miranda rulings state that unless you are 100% perfectly clear that you want a lawyer, then Miranda doesn't protect you. Case after case has come down on the side of law enforcement in situations where a "reasonable person" would clearly see that the suspect was asking for a lawyer but the courts have said, 'Sorry, the admission or confession comes in, because the accused was not “clear enough'.

Even if your Miranda rights are violated, recent court decisions have held that if you choose to testify the statements you made to the police (after they violated your Miranda rights) are still admissible in court. What this means is that police officers are encouraged to violate your Miranda rights to obtain admissions or confessions because they know that this will limit your options at trial.

The bottom line when dealing with law enforcement is to never waive your rights and never speak to them. You have a legal obligation to provide them with your name and identifying information, such as your drivers license. After that, you have no legal obligation to speak to police officers. At Wallin and Klarich, for over thirty years we have been urging our clients to be smart and to 'keep their mouths' shut when asked any questions by law enforcement. In most interactions with the police there is no tape recorder being used. This means if you speak to the police the police will prepare a report and will detail what 'they heard you say'. In many cases what the police report you told them IS NOT WHAT YOU TOLD THEM and almost always ends up implicating you in some sort of unlawful conduct. The downside of following this advise is that often the police officer will be upset with you and may choose to arrest you. However, in the long run you are MUCH BETTER OFF by not speaking to a police officer and when and if you are read your Miranda rights very clearly repeat over and over you do not wish to waive your rights and you will not speak to them without your lawyer present. In fact after saying that, say nothing else at all.

Of course, the next step is you may be arrested and you will be given the legal right to make certain phone calls within a short time after your arrest. You should make the first call to Wallin and Klarich at 877-466-5245 so we can begin to help you. Please remember that even if you are arrested, in the long run you will almost always help your case by refusing to speak to law enforcement about the facts of the case.

If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime, it is imperative that you contact our criminal defense attorneys at Wallin and Klarich. Wallin & Klarich will help protect your rights and find the best defense strategy for your case.  For over 30 years, our attorneys have handled many types of these cases with exceptional results. Please call us at (877) 466-5245 or visit our website at www.wklaw.com. We will be there when you call.

Miranda Rights - How Do They Work?

February 28, 2010,

There are several instances where an individual may be thinking, “They didn’t read me my rights: my case should get thrown out, right?”

One of the most misunderstood concepts in Southern California criminal law revolves around the “Miranda Rights.”

Most people have heard them all before:

  1. You have the right to remain silent.

  2. Anything you say can be used against you.

  3. You have the right to an attorney present during questioning.

  4. If you can’t afford an attorney, an attorney will be appointed to you at no cost to you.

While the rights are easy enough to understand, the application of the Miranda rule is less clear.

Basically, the purpose of the rule is to keep out any statements a defendant makes under very specific circumstances.

In order for Miranda to apply:

  • a. The defendant must be in custody or the functional equivalent, AND

  • b. There must be an interrogation by a government agent.

Continue reading "Miranda Rights - How Do They Work?" »