Southern California Defense Blog

California Penal Code Section 594 defines vandalism as any person who maliciously defaces with graffiti, damages, or destroys any real or personal property. This definition is so broad that it encompasses any sort of destructive or unsightly behaviors. Specifically, one can be charged with vandalism for minor crimes, such as scratching a name into a desk. Essentially, if the property or item does not belong to you and you destroy, deface, or damage it without the owner’s consent – you may be charged with the vandalism.

In order to be convicted of vandalism, the prosecution has the burden to prove that the defendant maliciously defaced with graffiti, damaged, or destroyed real or personal property; and the defendant did not own the property. If the prosecution is charging a felony, it must also be proven that the amount of damage caused by vandalism was $400 or more.

Vandalism is a considered to be a “wobbler.” This means a conviction for vandalism can be a misdemeanor or a felony. A felony conviction is punishable by imprisonment for up to three years in state prison, or a fine of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both fine and imprisonment. Vandalism is usually a felony when the damage was more than $400. However, vandalism committed against a church can be a felony and punishable by up to three years in state prison, regardless of the amount of damage done.

Continue reading "I am Accused of Vandalism - What Should I Do? - California Penal Code Section 594" »

The Southern California city of Chula Vista is a hub for businesses and tourists alike, and lies along the coast, stretching an estimated 51.2 square miles. Its evaluated population of 217,478 does not include the large number of travelers and tradesmen that enter the city annually in search of vacation and commerce. Like other major cities that cater to a variety of consumers and residents, situations of arrest for assault and battery can sometimes occur.

Assault and battery criminal charges can stagger the life of an individual in many ways. If convicted of assault or battery, an individual may face unfortunate consequences like fines and imprisonment. According to California Penal Code Section 242, a person can be taken into police custody for battery if he or she makes non-consensual physical contact with another person. Assault, as explained by Penal Code Section 240, is imputable when a person means to commit battery, has violent intent or wants to physically harm another. If you have been accused of such crimes, you can find out your legal rights by seeking the aid of an experienced Chula Vista battery defense attorney.

The Southern California assault and battery defense attorneys at Wallin and Klarich have three decades of experience helping Chula Vista residents who face criminal charges. Our aggressive legal defense team will protect your rights with strong defenses against assault and battery claims, such as lack of requisite intent to commit battery, intoxication, inability to follow through with assault and battery, providing defense for another person, or even self-defense. The law firm of Wallin and Klarich is prepared to answer your criminal defense questions and is immediately available to assist you with your case. Contact us today at 888-280-6839 or visit our website at www.wklaw.com for additional information.

California Health and Safety Code Section 11377 makes methamphetamine (“meth”) possession illegal. Meth Possession is a serious crime with serious penalties. If you are charged with meth possession, it is important that you speak to an experienced criminal defense attorney to get you the best possible result in your case.

Meth possession means that you had physical custody of the meth. You must also know the nature of meth as a controlled substance to be convicted. The amount of meth also has to be usable. If this can be proven, you may face a conviction for meth possession.

Having an experienced attorney can help you bring up defenses to your charge. There are many defenses to meth possession. The obvious one is that the defendant did not have physical control over the substance. Furthermore, the defendant cannot be convicted of possession of methamphetamine if he/she was not aware or had knowledge that the methamphetamine was in their presence or that it was a controlled substance.

There is also the momentary meth possession defense. Momentary possession requires that the defendant only possessed the substance for a momentary or transitory period; the possession of methamphetamine was for purposes of abandoning it, disposing of it or to destroy it.

Continue reading "I am Accused of Meth Possession - What Should I Do? - California Health and Safety Code Section 11377" »

Anyone who has been charged with possession of drug paraphernalia, under California Health and Safety Code Section 11364, should be prepared to retain an experienced criminal defense attorney. An experienced criminal defense attorney will know how to examine all the circumstances surrounding your case to secure the most favorable result.

Section 11364 of the California Health and Safety Code governs the possession of drug paraphernalia in California, which is a serious crime. "Drug paraphernalia" is broadly defined as all equipment, products, or materials of any kind which are intended for use in planting, cultivating, growing, manufacturing, compounding, producing, processing, or otherwise introducing a controlled substance into the human body.

There are many different penalties for possession of drug paraphernalia. Some charges can result in a misdemeanor conviction and fine to one thousand dollars ($1,000), while others may also result in the loss of your business license.

An experienced Southern California drug paraphernalia possession attorney can help you defend the charges. The most common defense for a possession of drug paraphernalia charge is authorized possession for personal use. A person is allowed to possess paraphernalia if it has been prescribed by a licensed physician. Also, possession of instruments for smoking marijuana, without more, is not a crime in California.

Continue reading "I am Accused of Possession of Drug Paraphernalia - What Should I Do? - California Health and Safety Code Section 11364" »

Spanning about 98.4 square miles, Riverside, California, is the 61st largest city in America, the number 12 largest city in all of California, and the number one biggest city in the metro area of Riverside-San Bernardino. Its approximate 311,575 residents are about 60 miles east of Los Angeles, and Riverside has its own notable sites including parks (California Citrus State Historic Park), museums (Riverside Metropolitan Museum), and schools (University of California, Riverside). The Mission Inn Hotel is also in Riverside; a national treasure as the nation’s hugest Mission Revival Style structure. Similar to other thriving cities, Riverside experiences incidents of arrests for assault and battery from time to time.

Being accused of an assault or battery crime in Riverside can be an intimidating experience that often leaves an individual feeling confused and overwhelmed regarding his or her legal rights and what defenses may be available. Based on California Penal Code Section 240, a person only has to be accused of intending to commit battery, physical violence, or willful use or force on another person to be arrested for assault. Under California Penal Code Section 242, an individual may be arrested for battery if physical contact or violence occurs beyond another person’s consent. In such instances, an accused individual may find it beneficial to contact an aggressive Riverside assault defense lawyer who will help them understand their rights and provide a strong defense for their case.

At Wallin & Klarich, our experienced and skilled Riverside assault and battery defense attorneys have been assisting those charged with a broad range of crimes for more than 30 years. Our Southern California legal team is extremely familiar with potential defenses to an assault and battery charge, some of which may include self-defense, defense of another, inability to actually carry out assault or battery, lack of requisite intent to commit battery, intoxication, and even consent on the part of the alleged victim. To learn more about how the criminal defense law firm of Wallin & Klarich can help you with your case, please visit our website at www.wklaw.com or call 888-280-6839 today.

California Health & Safety Code Section 11350 is a law that makes it illegal to possess various types of drugs as defined within the health and safety code.

In order to be convicted of possession of a controlled substance, the prosecution must prove that you unlawfully possessed a controlled substance, that you knew of its presence, that you knew of the substance’s nature or character as a controlled substance, what the controlled substance was, and that the quantity possessed was a usable amount. Possession means that a person has physical custody and control over the substance.

One of the many defenses to possession of a controlled substance is momentary/transitory possession. In order to successfully assert the defense of momentary/transitory possession, it must be shown that the defendant possessed the controlled substance only for a momentary or transitory period, that the defendant possessed the controlled substance in order to abandon, dispose of, or destroy it, and that the defendant did not intend to prevent law enforcement officials from obtaining the controlled substance. Of course, because every case is unique it is vital that you speak with an experienced criminal defense attorney about the particular facts of your case and any defense that may be available to you.

Continue reading "I am Accused of Possession of a Controlled Substance - What Should I Do? - California Health & Safety Code Section 11350" »

It was recently reported that Donald Haidl, the alleged “money man” for disgraced Orange County Sheriff Mike Carona, will not serve jail time because Haidl provided “extraordinary” cooperation with prosecutors in convicting Carona for corruption.

Haidl will instead pay a $40,000 fine and perform community service on a guilty plea for filing a false tax return. The crime carries a statutory minimum of three years in prison and a $100,000 fine.

During Carona’s corruption trial, Haidl testified about funneling illegal contributions to Carona’s election campaign and paying Carona and his top aid $1,000 a month to keep them from accepting bribes from any other source. Haidl also secretly recorded conversations with Carona on three occasions. One recorded conversation had Carona and Haidl discussing how they should testify before a grand jury, leading the jury to convict Carona of witness tampering. Carona was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in jail on the witness tampering charge.

Continue reading ""Money Man" Spared Jail Time and Felony Conviction in Exchange for Turning Informant and Providing Witness Testimony" »

Under California Vehicle Code Section 21809, the law now gives greater protection to emergency vehicles that are parked on the shoulder of a freeway. This means that if you are driving in either the very far right or very far left lanes, the law requires you to change lanes if you see that you are coming up behind an emergency vehicle that is parked on the freeway shoulder and has its lights flashing. If you determine that it would be unsafe for you to change lanes, then the law requires you to slow down to a reasonable speed.

If you have been ticketed for this infraction in California, make sure you hire a traffic ticket lawyer to help you get the case dismissed. If you are convicted of this traffic infraction, you are facing a $50 fine and one point on your driving record. However, penalty assessments will be added to the $50 so that the total amount you will have to pay will be closer to $200. By hiring a traffic ticket lawyer, you may be able to avoid paying the fines and you may also be able to avoid the points on your driving record.

Continue reading "Don't Get Ticketed for Passing a Parked Emergency Vehicle - California Vehicle Code Section 21809" »

Self-help guru, James Arthur Ray, has been charged with three counts of manslaughter after dozens of his followers collapsed in a sweat lodge at his retreat center in Arizona. Allegedly, over twenty people were hospitalized, and three of them never regained consciousness and died at a hospital. If he is convicted, Mr. Ray could be sentenced to more than 35 years in prison.

Since prosecutors charged Mr. Ray with manslaughter, Arizona law requires that the prosecution prove that James Ray acted with criminal intent. The prosecutors could prove criminal intent by showing that Mr. Ray acted recklessly and that his actions caused the deaths of his alleged victims. At trial, the prosecution might be able to show this by providing evidence that Mr. Ray was aware that others were ill at previous retreats. The prosecution could also show evidence that Mr. Ray lied about the incidents and ignored signs of medical distress among his followers.

Continue reading "An Arizona Self-Help Guru Has Been Charged With Manslaughter" »

NPR reported that a former emergency room doctor was convicted of six felony counts in an incident involving a car which was allegedly used as a weapon.

The news story said that the incident started when the doctor, while driving his car, got a little too close for comfort with a couple of cyclists who were apparently hogging the road. The doctor and the cyclists exchanged words, and the doctor went around the cyclists and suddenly slammed on his brakes. One of the cyclists couldn’t stop and slammed into the back of the car. The cyclist was severely injured and the doctor was arrested.

The doctor now faces up to 10 years in prison and also faces losing his driver’s license for the rest of his life because the weapon purportedly used was a car.

Have you or a loved one been accused of assault with a deadly weapon involving a motor vehicle? Assault with a deadly weapon in California is considered a serious or violent felony and could mean possible time in prison as well as a lifetime suspension of your driver’s license. It is important to contact an experienced attorney to represent your interests and your rights in court.

Continue reading "Doctor Convicted of Assault with a Deadly Weapon - California Penal Code Section 245" »

The number ten most populated city in California, Anaheim, stretches 50.5 miles to cover most of Orange County. Its estimated 348,467 residents share their city with a steady file of professionals and vacationers who come to conference, share business and see Anaheim’s well-known theme parks Disney California Adventure and Disneyland. The Anaheim Convention Center is another Anaheim staple, hosting leisure and sports events that draw families and friends seeking entertainment. As a favored tourist spot and friendly place to live, sometimes Anaheim residents do not want to admit instances of conflict and heated debate that may result in assault and battery charges.

Assault and battery charges in Anaheim may arise from an initially simple interaction. For instance, two or more parties can begin an argument about any subject, whether the situation is as small as an argument at a convenience store or a shouting match built from a larger scale fender bender. Sometimes the matter at hand can trigger a person’s negative emotions to provoke intense physical response or verbal backlash. According to Section 242 of the California Penal code, battery is defined as non-consensual physical contact, and is a criminal offense. However, section 240 of the Code says that a person does not have to follow through with their intent to commit battery in order to be accused of assault. If you have been charged with assault or arrested for battery, you may be left wondering how the law defines your legal rights and how you can better understand any unfortunate accusations set against you.

The Anaheim battery defense attorneys at Wallin and Klarich have over 30 years of experience tackling assault and battery cases, and also have defended many who face various other criminal offenses. The experienced group of Southern California lawyers is committed to helping you create a solid defense for your case so that your trial can have a positive conclusion. Defenses such as looking out for another person’s well-being, intoxication, physical inability to carry out attack, or even self-defense can be used to successfully explain your case. To reach one of the aggressive and confident lawyers at Wallin & Klarich who can aid you through your trial and translate your legal rights, visit www.wklaw.com, or call 888-280-6839 today.

Recently, a federal case against an Orange County politician was dealt a blow when a portion of the prosecutors’ audio evidence was found to be missing.

The case arose out of the 2006 general election for California’s 47th House of Representatives district to represent Santa Ana between incumbent Loretta Sanchez and challenger Tan Duc Nguyen. During the campaign, a letter apparently from Nguyen went out to 14,000 residents in the district with Latino names. The letter, written in Spanish, warned the residents that if they were immigrants, undocumented or otherwise, voting in the election would result in their imprisonment and deportation.

The U.S. Department of Justice formally charged Nguyen with obstruction of justice for not being truthful in his interview with investigators about the matter. However, the U.S. District Judge presiding over the case questioned why Nguyen wasn’t charged with actually sending out the letter himself.

Most damning, there was a 40 minute gap in the two-hour audio interview with Nguyen about the letter. After the first 15 minutes, the tape recorder apparently stopped working, but no one noticed until 40 minutes later, when a new one was brought in. The judge pointed out that during his days as a deputy district attorney, it was standard procedure to have two recorders tape interviews simultaneously.

Continue reading "How an Experienced Southern California Criminal Defense Attorney Can Find Errors and Flaws in Prosecutors Case" »